Unnamalai Thiagarajan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-18 Room
High Court
14 Jun 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Unnamalai Thiagarajan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-18 Room
Date of order
14 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Unnamalai Thiagarajan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-18 Room, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.15357 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLEMR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.No.15357 of 2024 andW.M.P.No.16681 of 2024
Unnamalai Thiagarajan
... Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18 Room No.46, New Building III Floor, Investigation Building, No.46 (Old No.108), Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034.
2. Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation)
Unit 3(1), Investigation Building, No.46 (Old No.108), Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034.
...Respondents
Prayer : A Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1[st] Respondent to
consider the Petitioner's request for extension of time dated 04.06.2024
1/6
W.P.No.15357 of 2024
and grant the Petitioner 45 days' time to obtain and furnish all requisite documents/details.
For Petitioner: Mr. Suhrith Parthasarathy
For Respondent:Mr. A.N.R.JayaprathapJunior Standing Counsel
ORDER
An order dated 23.03.2023 was issued against the petitioner under
the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and the imposition of Income-tax Act, 2015. Such order was carried in appeal by the petitioner before the first respondent.
2. The petitioner was called upon to provide documents, including bank statements relating to the petitioner's account with DBS Bank. By stating that the said bank account was closed a along time ago and that about 45 days is required to obtain the bank statement, the present writ petition was filed.
2/6
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the limited relief
requested for is to grant 45 days' time to obtain and provide the bank statement. He submits that the writ petition was filed on the reasonable apprehension that such time would not be granted by the first respondent.
4. Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned Junior standing counsel, accepts notice for the respondent.
5. The relief requested for by the petitioner is limited to granting 45 days' time to provide all documents called for by the first respondent. Such
request is made by stating that the petitioner's son has travelled to Singapore to obtain the statement from the DBS Bank and that this process is taking up time because the bank account was closed a long time ago. The reason set out by the petitioner appears to be reasonable.
6. Consequently, W.P.No.15357 of 2024 is disposed by directing
3/6
W.P.No.15357 of 2024
the first respondent to consider and grant the request for 45 days' time to provide all documents and information requested for by the first respondent.
7. W.P.No.15357 of 2024 is disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
14.06.2024
Index : Yes /NoSpeaking Order : Yes /NoNeutral Case Citation: Yes /No
kal
4/6
To
1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18 Room No.46, New Building III Floor, Investigation Building, No.46 (Old No.108), Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034.
2. Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) Unit 3(1), Investigation Building, No.46 (Old No.108), Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034.
5/6
6/6
W.P.No.15357 of 2024
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.kal
W.P.No.15357 of 2024 andW.M.P.No.16681 of 2024
14.06.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.