Case Law › High Court › Urdu Education Society v. National Facel...

Urdu Education Society v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Newdelhi And Others

High Court 26 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

26 Aug 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Urdu Education Society v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Newdelhi And Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 wp3497.22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3497 OF 2022 ( Urdu Education Society ..vs.. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, NewDelhi and others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Devendra Jain, Counsel h/f. Mr. A.M. Kukday, Counsel for thepetitioner, Mr. Anand Parchure, Counsel for the respondents. CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO &ANIL L. PANSARE, J J . DATED:26-08-2022 The learned Counsel for the petitioner states thatin view of the order dated 26-8-2022 in Writ Petition4664/2021, the petition may be disposed of aswithdrawn. 2.The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.)(ROHIT B. DEO, J.) adgokar

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.