Urmila Sawalka v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-24 And Others
High Court
02 Mar 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Urmila Sawalka v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-24 And Others
Date of order
02 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Urmila Sawalka v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-24 And Others, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: On the request of counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.153 OF 2010
Urmila Sawalka..Petitioner.
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax-24 and others..Respondents.
....
Mr. Jitendra Jain with Mr. Girish B. Kedia for the Petitioner.Ms. Suchitra Kamble for the Respondents.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C. :
2[nd] March, 2010.
On the request of counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the Revenue, the papers of the Petition have been called for and the Petition has been taken on Board by consent.
At the hearing of the Petition counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue has placed on the record a communication dated 9[th ]
February, 2010 addressed by the Under Secretary to the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central
Board of Direct Taxes to the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-(XIII). The communication specifically refers to Writ Petitions 141, 142, 146, 147 and 153 of 2010 pending before this Court. By the communication leave has been sought to recall the impugned order dated 15[th] December, 2009 passed under Section 127(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and to permit the department to consider the matter afresh in accordance with law. An affidavit to that effect has also been filed by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax – XIII, Mumbai dated 17[th] February, 2010. In terms of the request made before the Court and since the Respondents are recalling the order dated 15[th] December, 2009 with a view to consider the matter afresh in accordance with law, the Petition will not survive. On the request of counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.