Case LawHigh Court › Usha Anandanno.97 And 98 R.k.mutt Road,...

Usha Anandanno.97 And 98 R.k.mutt Road, Chennai - 600 028 v. The Income Tax Officernon Corporate Ward -2(1), Chennai

High Court 26 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Usha Anandanno.97 And 98 R.k.mutt Road, Chennai - 600 028 v. The Income Tax Officernon Corporate Ward -2(1), Chennai
Date of order
26 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Usha Anandanno.97 And 98 R.k.mutt Road, Chennai - 600 028 v. The Income Tax Officernon Corporate Ward -2(1), Chennai, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

CMP NO. 4522 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN CMP NO. 4522 of 2025 AND TCA SR NO. 69260 OF 2022 Usha AnandanNo.97 and 98 R.K.Mutt Road, Chennai - 600 028. Vs The Income Tax officerNon Corporate Ward -2(1), Chennai. Appellant(s) TCA SR NO. 69260 of 2022 Respondent(s) Usha AnandanNo.97 and 98, R.K.Mutt Road, Chennai-28 Vs The Income Tax officerNon Corporate Circle-2(1), Chennai-6 Appellant(s) CMP NO. 4522 of 2025 Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): R.Sivaraman P.RameshkumarS.SrividyaRaghav Rajeev MenonS.Gautham Venkata Narayan For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Ravikumar, Senior Standing counselchennai TCA SR NO. 69260 of 2022 For Appellant(s):For Respondent(s): ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.) 1. This petition is filed to condone the delay of 938 days in representing the above appeal. 2. Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and shas no serious objection in allowing this petition. 3. Even though the appellant/petitioner has given reasons, this Court is of the view that the delay could have been avoided by showing due diligence. 4. Hence, this petition is ordered on condition that the petitioner / appellant pays a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Chennai, within a period of two weeks from today. (S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.) 26-02-2025 CMP NO. 4522 of 2025 To 1. The Income Tax officerNon Corporate Ward -2(1), Chennai. TCA SR NO. 69260 of 2022 1. The Income Tax officerNon Corporate Circle-2(1), Chennai-6
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan