In Usha Rani v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
ORDER
SB Civil Writ Petition No.431/2006
Usha Rani versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & anr
20.10.2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI
Mr Sanjay Jhanwar – for petitioner/s
Mrs Parinitoo Jain – for revenue
BY THE COURT:
Learned counsel for respondents is directed to find out asto whether in the appeal preferred by the CIT (Appeals) in the handsof the revenue the assessment order in the case of the petitioner'shusband has been modified imposing additional tax liability or theappeal preferred by the revenue has been dismissed without causinginterference in the order of assessment in the case of petitioner'shusband. List this case on 7.11.2016.
(MN BHANDARI), J.
bnsharma
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue