Usharani Palanivel v. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward, Coimbatore
High Court
06 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Usharani Palanivel v. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward, Coimbatore
Date of order
06 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Usharani Palanivel v. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward, Coimbatore, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.P.No.16088 of 2022 and
WMP.Nos.15441, 15442, 15435, 15437, 15450 & 15452 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.07.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.16088 of 2022 and
WMP.Nos.15441, 15442, 15435, 15437, 15450 & 15452 of 2022
Usharani Palanivel
... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward, Coimbatore,
No.63, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore 641 018.
2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Coimbatore, Income Tax Department, Income Tax Department,
No.63, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641 018.
3.The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 1(4), Coimbatore,
Income Tax Department, No.63, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641 018.
... Respondents
Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue aWrit of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the Writ
W.P.No.16088 of 2022 and
WMP.Nos.15441, 15442, 15435, 15437, 15450 & 15452 of 2022
Petitioner on the file of the First Respondent to quash the impugned order dated 25.05.2022 passed u/s 147 read with 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2017-18 in DIN & Order No.ITBA/AST/S/147/ 2022-23/1043157841(1) and consequently direct the First Respondent to complete the re-assessment proceedings afresh for the assessment year 2017-18 after granting reasonable/sufficient opportunity of hearing.
For Petitioner: Mr.A.S.Sriraman
For Respondents: Mr.ANR.Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel
O R D E R
Read this order in conjunction with order dated 29.06.2022. Today,
learned counsel for the petitioner confirms that statutory appeal has been filed before the National Faceless Appeal Centre on 04.07.2022 along with stay application seeking interim relief. An endorsement has thus been made by him seeking withdrawal of this writ petition.
2.This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The stay application shall be taken up by the jurisdictional assessing officer, notice issued to the petitioner for hearing, the petitioner heard and an order be passed thereupon. Till such time, no recovery proceedings be initiated as against the petitioner for a period of eight (8) weeks from today, or till the disposal of the application, whichever is earlier.
W.P.No.16088 of 2022 and
WMP.Nos.15441, 15442, 15435, 15437, 15450 & 15452 of 2022
3.The petitioner is also at liberty to move the National Faceless
Appeal Centre seeking early expeditious disposal of the appeal, which
request, if and when made, shall be considered by the Centre, in accordance
with law and its roster. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
06.07.2022
kbs
Index : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non speaking Order
Note:Registry is directed to upload this order on 07.07.2022.
To
1.The Income Tax Officer,
International Taxation Ward,
Coimbatore,
No.63, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore 641 018.
2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Coimbatore, Income Tax Department,
No.63, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641 018.
3.The Income Tax Officer,
Non Corporate Ward 1(4),
Coimbatore, Income Tax Department, Income Tax Department,
No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu 641 018.
W.P.No.16088 of 2022 andWMP.Nos.15441, 15442, 15435, 15437, 15450 & 15452 of 2022
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
kbs
W.P.No.16088 of 2022 andWMP.Nos.15441, 15442, 15435,15437, 15450 & 15452 of 2022
06.07.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.