Ut Worlwide (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax – 11(1)(2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1105 OF 2019 UT Worlwide (India) Pvt. Ltd. .... Petitioner versus Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax – 11(1)(2)... Respondent….... Mr.R.V. Easwar, Senior Counsel a/w Ms.Rubal Bansal a/w Mr.Paras Sevla a.w Mr.Harsh Shah, Advocate for Petitioner.Mr.R.V. Easwar, Senior Counsel a/w Ms.Rubal Bansal a/w Mr.Paras Sevla a.w Mr.Harsh Shah, Advocate for Petitioner.•Mr.P.C. Chhotaray a/w Mr.P.A. Narayanan, Advocate for Respondent.Mr.P.C. Chhotaray a/w Mr.P.A. Narayanan, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.DATE: 18[th] APRIL, 2019. P.C. : 1. After some arguments at the bar, the learned Counselfor the Petitioner agreed that the Petitioner would take up allthe issues before the Dispute Resolution Panel ('DRP' for short)arising out of the draft order of assessment passed by theAssessing Officer, pursuant to the order passed by the TransferPricing Officer. We notice that a part of this order is already challenged by the Petitioner before the DRP. Other part of thechallenge was sought to be brought in the present Petition. 2. In view of the stand now taken by the Petitioner, wepermit the Petitioner to raise all objections before the DRP, forwhich purpose it would be open for the Petitioner to filefurther/fresh objections before the DRP. If the same is filedlatest by 10/05/2019, the DRP shall take such objections onrecord and decide them on merits along with existing objections.We have expressed no opinion. All contentions are kept open. 3. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)