Uttarayan Financial Services Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 14/2 And Ors
High Court
17 Jan 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Uttarayan Financial Services Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 14/2 And Ors
Date of order
17 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Uttarayan Financial Services Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 14/2 And Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD –2
ORDER SHEET
WPO/3347/2022IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
UTTARAYAN FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
VS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 14/2 AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 17[th ]January, 2023.
Appearance:Ms. Swapna Das, Adv.Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv.…For the Petitioner
Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Adv.Mr. Anurag Roy, Adv.…For the Revenue
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as appears fromrecord and submissions of the parties and particularly the prayer of thepetitioner for expeditious disposal of its appeal in question relating toassessment year 2017-18 which was filed long back on 14[th] January, 2020,this writ petition being WPO 3347 of 2022 is disposed of by directing the CIT(Appeal) concerned to consider and dispose of the appeal in question filed bythe petitioner expeditiously and preferably within three months from thedate of communication of this order without granting unnecessaryadjournment to the parties.
For other grievance relating to action of the Authority concernedrefunding the amount realised from the petitioner, petitioner will be free to
make appropriate representation before the Authority concerned who willconsider the same in accordance with law.
TR/
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.