Case LawHigh Court › Vadivelu Anbazhagan v. The Commissioner...

Vadivelu Anbazhagan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Delhi. …

High Court 06 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Vadivelu Anbazhagan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Delhi. …
Date of order
06 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
2016-17, 2016-2017
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Vadivelu Anbazhagan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Delhi. …, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 143, Section 263 of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Writ Petition No.20140 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.06.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLEMR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Writ Petition No.20140 of 2025 Vadivelu Anbazhagan ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Delhi. … Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to grant an opportunity for personal hearing and dispose of the Appeal No. NFAC/2015-16/10141856 filed by the Petitioner for AY 2016-17 within a period of three months. For Petitioner :Ms.B.R.VarshiniFor Respondent :Mr.V.Mahalingam,Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Respondent to grant an opportunity for personal hearing and dispose of the Appeal No NFAC/2015-16/10141856 filed by the Petitioner for AY 2016-2017 within a period of three months. 1/4 Writ Petition No.20140 of 2025 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the Assessing officer passed an order on 17.09.2021 under Section 143(3) r/w. Section 263 and 144B making addition and raising a demand of Rs.58,15,229/- as against the petitioner in respect of the assessment years 2016- 2017. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the respondent on 10.03.2022. However, the appeal has been pending on the file of the respondent for more than three years and the petitioner has been deprived of an opportunity of personal hearing. Hence, this petition. 3. At the outset, Mr.V.Mahalingam, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent would submit that the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 10.03.2022 would be considered on merits by the Respondent and orders would be passed after affording an opportunity of personal hearing. 4. In view of the same and the limited relief sought for in this Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the Respondent to consider the appeal filed by petitioner dated 10.03.2022, on its own merits and pass 2/4 Writ Petition No.20140 of 2025 appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the appeal and it is open to the respondent to consider the appeal on its own merits and in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 06.06.2025 vumIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking Order:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/No To: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) National Faceless Assessment Centre,Income Tax Department, Delhi. 3/4 4/4 Writ Petition No.20140 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.vum W.P.No.20140 of 2025 06.06.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan