Case Law › High Court › Vagaji Ninama v. Income Tax Officer, War...

Vagaji Ninama v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Banswara

High Court 17 May 2023 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

17 May 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Vagaji Ninama v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Banswara, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the instant writ petition is dismissed as havingbecome infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12819/2022 Vagaji Ninama S/o Shri Meg Ji Ninama, Aged About 82 Years,Having Its Residential Address At Bari Dailab, District Banswara327001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Department Of Revenue,Ministry Of Finance, Government Of India, Having ItsAddress At North Block, New Delhi, Through Its ChairmanMinistry Of Finance, Government Of India, Having ItsAddress At North Block, New Delhi, Through Its Chairman 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward Banswara Having Its Address AtMaharana Pratap Circle, Udaipur Road, Banswara 327001Maharana Pratap Circle, Udaipur Road, Banswara 327001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshvardhan Singh ChundawatFor Respondent(s): Mr. K. K. Bissa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/05/2023 Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that this writpetition has rendered infructuous. Hence, the instant writ petition is dismissed as havingbecome infructuous. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J 1-AjaySingh/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.