Case Law › High Court › Vandeep Singh Shergill v. Commissioner O...

Vandeep Singh Shergill v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Patiala And Others

High Court 21 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

21 Jul 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Vandeep Singh Shergill v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Patiala And Others, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 3443 of 2014 Decided on : 21.07.2014 Vandeep Singh Shergill Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Patiala and others . . . Petitioner . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocate for the respondents. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the writ petition, the appeal filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has been decided against the petitioner. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the petitioner intends to file an appeal against the order of the Tribunal. It was submitted that in view of the decision of the Tribunal, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. 3.Ordered accordingly. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE July 21, 2014J.Ram (JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.