Case Law › High Court › Vanita Sanjeev Anand v. Income Tax Offic...

Vanita Sanjeev Anand v. Income Tax Officer Ward 45(1

High Court 08 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

08 Jan 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Vanita Sanjeev Anand v. Income Tax Officer Ward 45(1, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~38. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12359/2018 VANITA SANJEEV ANAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.R. Manjani and Mr. B.K. Manjani, Advocates versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 45(1) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Ms. Talha A. Rahman, Mr. Siddharth Gupta and Mr. Mohd. Shaz Khan, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % O R D E R14.01.2020 The matter had been heard by us on 08.01.2020. While dictating the order in Chamber, we felt the need for further hearing the learned counsels in the matter. Accordingly, the matter has been listed today for directions. List for further hearing on 15.01.2020. VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 14, 2020 N.Khanna SANJEEV NARULA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.