Case Law › High Court › Varad Mehta v. Cy Commissioner Income Ta...

Varad Mehta v. Cy Commissioner Income Tax

High Court 23 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_jbp

Parties

Date of order

23 Jan 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Varad Mehta v. Cy Commissioner Income Tax, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.C.C No.224/2018 (Varad Mehta Vs. Cy Commissioner Income Tax) - 1 - --Jabalpur, Dated : 23012018 Shri Shailendra Singh Thakur, learned counsel for theapplicant. Heard on the application for restoration of W.P.No.10156/2017, which has been dismissed for non-compliance of the common conditional order dated11.9.2017. It is submitted by the learned counsel for theapplicant that the aforesaid writ petition stood dismissedon account of the fact that he could not comply with thecommon conditional order dated 11.9.2017. Theapplication is supported by an afÏdavit of the learnedcounsel for the applicant. It is submitted that theapplication for restoration deserves to be allowed. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicantand looking to the fact that the reasons stated in theapplication for restoration of W.P. No.10156/2017 arebonafide, the same is allowed and W.P. No.10156/2017 isdirected to be restored to its original number, subject toremoval of default within a week. This MCC stands disposed of. A copy of this order be placed in the record of W.P.No.10156/2017. C.C as per rules. (R. S. Jha) J U D G E (Nandita Dubey) J U D G E pp. Digitally signed by PUSHPENDRA PATEL Date: 2018.01.23 16:05:32 +05'30'

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.