Case LawHigh Court › Varadharajan Gokulakrishnan v. The Incom...

Varadharajan Gokulakrishnan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporte Ward 4(3), Room

High Court 14 Feb 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Varadharajan Gokulakrishnan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporte Ward 4(3), Room
Date of order
14 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Varadharajan Gokulakrishnan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporte Ward 4(3), Room, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: After recording the letter dated 16.01.2023 referred to supra, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.02.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.6151 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.6220 and 15313 of 2022 Varadharajan Gokulakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporte Ward 4(3), Room No.210, BSNL Building, II Floor,Income Tax Office - BSNL Tower,No.16, Greams Road,Chennai - 600 006.... Respondent PRAYER:Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in DIN & Notice No:ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-22/1032211612(1) dated 05.04.2021 on the file of the respondent relating to A.Y. 2015-16 and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr.G.Baskar 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER The petitioner has placed before this Court a letter dated 16.01.2023 issued by the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) and addressed to the petitioner, wherein it has been stated as follows: "This is to intimate that in the present assessment / re-assessment e-Proceedings, the Notice u/s 148 was generated during the period from 01.04.2021 to 30.06.2021 under the old provisions of Sections 147 to 151. Therefore, prima-facie, this proceedings is covered by the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "UoI Vs. Ashish Agarwal" dated 04.05.2022. It is seen that the jurisdictional Assessing Officer has subsequently issued a new Notice u/s.148 under the new provisions in pursuance of the said decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Therefore, in view of existence of two e-Proceedings for the same AY and Section, one of which has been later initiated in pursuance of the said judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the present order proceeding which is now rendered redundant being covered by the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court is being hereby closed. It is pertinent to mention that identification of the proceeding for closure has been done based on date extracted from the system, therefore, it is possible that in a rare case, a wrong proceeding gets closed. Therefore, the same will be restored if it would be noticed or informed by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer or any Income Tax Authority that the proceeding which has been closed is not the proceedings covered by the aforesaid Supreme Court decision." 2. Since the duplicate assessment / re-assessment e-Proceedings initiated against the petitioner has been closed due to the aforesaid reason mentioned in the letter dated 16.01.2023, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Writ Petition. 3. After recording the letter dated 16.01.2023 referred to supra, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 14.02.2023 Index: Yes/NoSpeaking Order : Yes / NoNeutral Citation Case: Yes / Noab 4/6 To The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporte Ward 4(3), Room No.210, BSNL Building, II Floor, Income Tax Office - BSNL Tower, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006. 5/6 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6151 of 2022 ABDUL QUDDHOSE. J., ab W.P.No.6151 of 2022 14.02.2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan