Case Law › High Court › Vasant Chauhan Huf v. Income Tax Officer...

Vasant Chauhan Huf v. Income Tax Officer 25(2)(4), Mumbai & Others

High Court 10 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Jun 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Vasant Chauhan Huf v. Income Tax Officer 25(2)(4), Mumbai & Others, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1321 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.858 OF 2009 Vasant Chauhan HUF ..Appellant. Versus Income tax Officer 25(2)(4), Mumbai & Others..Respondents. Mr.S.J. Mehta for the appellant.Mr.N.A. Kazi for the respondent. P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of notice of motion, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute with no order as to costs.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.