Case Law › High Court › Vashi, Bombay v. Mrs.vasanti G.nerurkar

Vashi, Bombay v. Mrs.vasanti G.nerurkar

High Court 05 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

05 Mar 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Vashi, Bombay v. Mrs.vasanti G.nerurkar, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.

Decision: In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion No.2013/2003, the learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal, Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.652 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.652 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.652 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax -22, Vashi, Bombay .. Appellant V/s Mrs.Vasanti G.Nerurkar .. Respondent Mr.A.Kotangale for the Appellant. Mr.Subramaniam with Mr.V.S.Hadade for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN& CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 5th March, 2007. DATE : 5th March, 2007. DATE : 5th March, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: 1. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion No.2013/2003, the learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal, Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the rules. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.