Vasundhara Shailesh Joshi v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle-2(1), Pune
High Court
16 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Vasundhara Shailesh Joshi v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle-2(1), Pune
Date of order
16 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Vasundhara Shailesh Joshi v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle-2(1), Pune, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, we allow withdrawal of the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Balaji G.Panchal
Digitally signed byBalaji G. PanchalDate: 2020.12.1714:27:12 +0530
(2)-ITXA-2734-18.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2734 OF 2018
Vasundhara Shailesh Joshi
..Appellant
Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle-2(1), Pune
..Respondent
Mr. Mandar Vaidya, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 16[th] DECEMBER, 2020
P.C.
1. Heard Mr. Mandar Vaidya, learned counsel for the appellantand Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel revenue for the respondent.
2. This appeal has been filed under section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 by the assessee as the appellant against the order dated27.03.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B Bench, Punein ITA Nos.95 & 96/PUN/2016 for the assessment years 2009-10 & 2010-11.
3. Today, the appeal is listed on praecipe filed by learned counselfor the appellant.
4. It is submitted that parliament has enacted the Direct TaxVivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 providing for a scheme for resolution of taxdisputes and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.
BGP.
1 of 2
(2)-ITXA-2734-18.doc.
5. In terms of the said Act, appellant filed declaration undersection 3 before the designated authority. Certificate under section 5(1)was issued by the designated authority on 13.08.2020 determining the taxpayable at ‘nil’. For passing of final order under section 5(2) appellant isrequired to withdraw the appeal under section 4(3). Hence, the prayer forwithdrawal of the appeal.
6. Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel revenue has noobjection to the prayer for withdrawal.
7. Accordingly, we allow withdrawal of the appeal. Appeal isdisposed of on withdrawal.
8. Refund as per rules.
9.This order will be digitally signed by the Personal Assistant ofthis Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of adigitally signed copy of this order.
ABHAY AHUJA, J
UJJAL BHUYAN, J
2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.