Case LawHigh Court › Vasundhra Ganning P Ltd v. Commissioner...

Vasundhra Ganning P Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 18 Jul 1996 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Vasundhra Ganning P Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Jul 1996
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Vasundhra Ganning P Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 292 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- VASUNDHRA GANNING P LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JP SHAH for Petitioner MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN Date of decision: 18/07/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT ��"Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256 (1) of the Income tax Act, 1961 to this court for opinion :- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances off the case, the Tribunal was justified in law is not granting weighted deduction of Rs.2,62,286/-, Rs.2,04,648/- and Rs.2,91,945/for assessment years 1977-78, 1979-80 and 1980-81 respectively representing freight etc., expenses on the basis ob Bombay High Court decision in Universal Ferro and Allied Chemicals Ltd. v. G.K.Wariyar reported in 143 ITR 959 ?" ��This Court in the case of Testeels Ltd. v. C.I.T., 205 ITR 230, has taken the view that subclause (iii) of Section 35b (1)(b) clearly lays down that the expenditure incurred for freight insurance is not admissible for weighted deduction. In view of this decision, this question is to be answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Accordingly, the reference is answered with no order as to costs."
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan