Vasundhra Ganning P Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
18 Jul 1996 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Vasundhra Ganning P Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Jul 1996
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Vasundhra Ganning P Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 292 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
VASUNDHRA GANNING P LTD
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR JP SHAH for Petitioner
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE R.R.JAIN
Date of decision: 18/07/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
��"Tribunal has referred the following
question under Section 256 (1) of the Income tax Act,
1961 to this court for opinion :-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances
off the case, the Tribunal was justified in law
is not granting weighted deduction of
Rs.2,62,286/-, Rs.2,04,648/- and Rs.2,91,945/for
assessment years 1977-78, 1979-80 and 1980-81 respectively representing freight etc., expenses on the basis ob Bombay High Court decision in Universal Ferro and Allied Chemicals Ltd. v. G.K.Wariyar reported in 143 ITR 959 ?" ��This Court in the case of Testeels Ltd. v. C.I.T., 205 ITR 230, has taken the view that subclause (iii) of Section 35b (1)(b) clearly lays down that the expenditure incurred for freight insurance is not admissible for weighted deduction. In view of this decision, this question is to be answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
Accordingly, the reference is answered with no order as to costs."
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.