Case LawHigh Court › V.c.daga J v. Law

V.c.daga J v. Law

High Court 20 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
V.c.daga J v. Law
Date of order
20 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In V.c.daga J v. Law, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: Heard learned counsel for the rival 2.By this appeal, the following question of law are sought to be raised by the appellant- Revenue: "(A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law, theI.T.A.T. is right in directing the A.O.to tax the dividend income on net basis?

Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income-tax-2,Mumbai.V/s.M/s.Tata Sons Ltd. ... Appellant. ... Respondent. Vimal Gupta with P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Dinesh Vyas, senior counsel with Ajit Shah andP.C.Tripathi for the respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 20th April 2009. P.C. : ---- .parties. Perused appeal. Heard learned counsel for the rival 2.By this appeal, the following question of law are sought to be raised by the appellant- Revenue: "(A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law, theI.T.A.T. is right in directing the A.O.to tax the dividend income on net basis? 2.The learned counsel for the assessee hasbrought to our notice that the aforesaid question covered by judgment of this Court in C.I.T. Ambalal , Kilachand(1995) 81 Taxman 435 (Bom). this view of the matter no substantial question of is involved in this appeal. Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.) is v. In law
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan