Case LawHigh Court › Ved Investment And Trading Pvt. Ltd v. I...

Ved Investment And Trading Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 13(3)(3

High Court 01 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ved Investment And Trading Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 13(3)(3
Date of order
01 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ved Investment And Trading Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 13(3)(3, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: This amount shall be paid before 4[th] February 2022, failing which, petition will stand dismissed withoutfurther reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.431 OF 2020 Ved Investment and Trading Pvt. Ltd.Vs.Income Tax Officer, Ward 13(3)(3) ...Petitioner...Respondent Mr. Sankalp Sharma for Petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondent. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.DATE :FEBRUARY 01, 2022 P.C.:- 1.We have noticed that Mr. Prem Jha has not been appearing formany matters. Even in this matter, he did not appear yesterday. As hashappened in the past, Mr. Sankalp Sharma appeared for Mr. Prem Jhatoday. We were initially inclined to dismiss the petition but purely byway of indulgence, deferred the matter to be listed today. 2.Mr. Sharma states that he will file Vakalatnama within a weekfrom today under advice to Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma and undertakes togo on with the matter on the next date. Undertaking accepted. 3.For yesterday's and today's adjournments, petitioner to pay a sumof Rs.10,000/- to High Court Legal Aid Fund, AccountNo.60045304283, IFSC- of Bank of Maharashtra,Branch - Fort, Mumbai 400 032, maintained by the High Court LegalServices Committee, Mumbai, Room No.105, 1[st] Floor, PWD Building,High Court, Mumbai and to furnish the details of such cost to the HighCourt Legal Services Committee, Mumbai and obtain the receipt thereofphysically or through Email, i.e., , which shallbe the proof of such payment / deposit. This amount shall be paid before 4[th] February 2022, failing which, petition will stand dismissed withoutfurther reference to the Court. If the amount is paid and compliance isfiled with the registry, petition to be listed for 'admission' on 8[th ]February,2022. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) Minal Parab
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan