Vedanta Ltd. (Formerlyknownassterliteindustries (India) Ltd. Rep.by Benicio Menezes v. Asstt. Commissioner Ofincome Tax Circle 1(1),Panaji And Anr
High Court
23 Oct 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Vedanta Ltd. (Formerlyknownassterliteindustries (India) Ltd. Rep.by Benicio Menezes v. Asstt. Commissioner Ofincome Tax Circle 1(1),Panaji And Anr
Date of order
23 Oct 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Vedanta Ltd. (Formerlyknownassterliteindustries (India) Ltd. Rep.by Benicio Menezes v. Asstt. Commissioner Ofincome Tax Circle 1(1),Panaji And Anr, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Suchitra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.377/2023IN
WRIT PETITION NO.484/2016
VEDANTA LTD. (FORMERLYKNOWNASSTERLITEINDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. REP.BY BENICIO MENEZES
... APPLICANT
Versus
ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1),PANAJI AND ANR.
… RESPONDENTS
Mr R. G. Ramani, Senior Advocate with Mr P. Kakodkar,Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Respondents.
CORAM:M. S. SONAK &
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED:23[rd] OCTOBER 2023
P.C.:
1.Place Writ Petition No.484/2016 for final hearing in theweek commencing from 22.01.2024. the matter to be placedhigh on board subject to overnight part heard matters.
2.Te matter to remain on board until it is finally disposedof.
3.Misc. Civil Application No.377/2023 is disposed of.
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.M. S. SONAK, J.
SUCHITRA Digitally signed by SUCHITRA NANDAN NANDAN SINGBAL SINGBALDate: 2023.10.25 10:47:57 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.