Case Law › High Court › Vedanta Ltd., (Successors Of The Madras...

Vedanta Ltd., (Successors Of The Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circel 1(1), Panaji And Anr

High Court 02 Feb 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

02 Feb 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Vedanta Ltd., (Successors Of The Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circel 1(1), Panaji And Anr, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 98 OF 2017IN WRIT PETITION NO. 116 OF 2017 VEDANTA LTD., (SUCCESSORS OF THE MADRAS ALUMINIUM CO. LTD.)., Versus ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCEL 1(1), PANAJI AND ANR., ... Applicant ... Respondents Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachit Jolly, andMr. R. G. Ramani, Advocates for the applicant. Ms. S. Linhares, Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents. -Coram:F. M. REIS & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. -Date: 2nd February, 2017 P.C.: Mr. B. Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for theapplicant, upon instructions, seeks permission to withdraw theapplication, with liberty to file a fresh application. Permissiongranted. The application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. ssm. F. M. REIS, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.