Veear Enterprises, Thr. Its v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 (1), Panaji And Anr
High Court
21 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Veear Enterprises, Thr. Its v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 (1), Panaji And Anr
Date of order
21 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Veear Enterprises, Thr. Its v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 (1), Panaji And Anr, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 1124 OF 2019
VEEAR ENTERPRISES, THR. ITS PARTNER, ROHIT JAIN GANGWAL.,
Versus
... Petitioner
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2 (1), PANAJI AND ANR.,
... Respondents
Mr. Jitendra Jain, Mr. Gaurang D. Panandiker and Ms. EeshaDukle, Advocates for the Petitioners.Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Respondent nos.1and 2.
-Coram:M. S. SONAK &
SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ.
-Date:21st January, 2020
P.C.
Mr. Jain, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, onthe basis of instructions, states that the reliefs in this petitionstand worked out and, therefore, there is no necessity of pursuingthis petition any further.
2. Ms. Linhares, the learned Standing Counsel for therespondents also agrees.
3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off as infructuous.
SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, J.
M. S. SONAK, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue