Case LawHigh Court › Veerbhadram Bhavusingh Vislvath, Age 42...

Veerbhadram Bhavusingh Vislvath, Age 42 Years v. The State Of Maharashtra

High Court 05 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Veerbhadram Bhavusingh Vislvath, Age 42 Years v. The State Of Maharashtra
Date of order
05 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Veerbhadram Bhavusingh Vislvath, Age 42 Years v. The State Of Maharashtra, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 of 2 907.BA.2393.2018OP.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2393 OF 2018 Veerbhadram Bhavusingh Vislvath,Age 42 years, R/o.E-37, 6thfloor,Darbhanga House, Income Tax Colony,Pedder Road, Mumbai-400 020(presently lodged at Arthur Road Jail)Applicantversus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Dr.Sujay Kantawalla with Mr.Kartik Dave and Aishwarya KantallaI/by Mr.P.R.Dave for applicant.Ms.A.A.Takalkar, APP, for State. Mr.Salunkhe, Police Inspector, Gaondevi Police Station, present. PC : CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.DATE : 5[th] October 2018 1.For the reasons to be recorded separately, following order ispassed : ORDER (i)Criminal Bail Application No.2393 of 2018 is allowed anddisposed off; (ii)The applicant is directed to be released on bail in connectionwith CR No.169 of 2018 registered with Gaondevi Police Station,Mumbai, on furnishing PR bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with oneor more sureties in the like amount; (iii)The applicant shall report Gaondevi Police Station once in amonth on every first Saturday between 10 am and 12 noon tillfurther orders; 2 of 2 907.BA.2393.2018OP.doc (iv)The applicant shall not try to tamper with the evidence andshall not approach the prosecution witnesses as well as shall not callor meet the complainant and the victim and their family members;(v)The applicant shall attend the Trial Court regularly on everydate of hearing, unless exempted by the Court for some reason;(vi)The applicant is permitted to furnish cash security in the sumof Rs.50,000/- for a period of four weeks. MST (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan