Ventures Limited v. Mr.b.d. Naik, Deputy Commissioner Of

Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.01.0714:43:55+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1158 OF 2009 Sterlite Opportunities andVentures Limitedvs. ...Petitioner 1) Mr.B.D. Naik, Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax & 3 Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Hasmukh Ravaria i/b DMD Advocates for petitioner.Mr.Suresh Kumar for respondents. CORAM :K.R. SHRIRAM & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE :6[th] JANUARY, 2022 (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) P.C.: 1.Mr. Ravaria for petitioner seeks one week time to take instructions. Time granted. 2.At the same time, we also find there is a Chamber Summons beingChamber Summons No.216 of 2017 taken out by petitioner, which ispending. The Chamber Summons is for amending the petition to reflectthe change in the name of petitioner and also bring on recorddevelopments subsequent to the filing of the petition culminating with thechange of name. 3.Mr. Ravaria states the chamber summons has been served onrespondents but no reply opposing the Chamber Summons has been filed. 4.Mr.Suresh Kumar has no objection if the amendment is allowed. 5.In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms ofprayer clause (a). Item 3 in the Schedule to the Chamber Summons, viz. “Consequential amendments in the Petition and otherpleadings/proceedings, as required” is not granted. 6.Amendment to be carried out and amended petition to be served onor before 17[th] January 2022.or before 17[th] January 2022. 7.Chamber Summons stands disposed of. 8.Petition be listed on 20[th] January 2022. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)