Versusahmednagar Jilha Prathamik Shikshansahkari Bank v. Gangapurwala Andn. W. Sambre, Jj. Date : 16Th September, 2016
High Court
16 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Versusahmednagar Jilha Prathamik Shikshansahkari Bank v. Gangapurwala Andn. W. Sambre, Jj. Date : 16Th September, 2016
Date of order
16 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Versusahmednagar Jilha Prathamik Shikshansahkari Bank v. Gangapurwala Andn. W. Sambre, Jj. Date : 16Th September, 2016, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.In view of that, tax appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 ta 39.09
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
TAX APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 1,Pune
VersusAhmednagar Jilha Prathamik ShikshanSahkari Bank
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate for the Appellant.The Respondent served.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA ANDN. W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
.Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel for the appellant on instructions states that, as the appeal does not exceed limit of Rs. 20 Lacs, the department has instructed him to withdraw the appeal.
2.In view of that, tax appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. It is made clear that, we have not dealt with the contentions on merits.
[ N. W. SAMBRE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Sept. 16
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue