Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Versusassistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1) Panaji-Goa v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:13Th March, 2012
Date of order
13 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
In Versusassistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1) Panaji-Goa v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:13Th March, 2012, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 284 OF 2012
M/S. TERACOM LIMITED
VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1) PANAJI-GOA.
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr.Santosh Rama Rivankar for the applicant.Ms.Asha Dessai for the respondent.
P.C.:
-Coram:S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &U. V. BAKRE, JJ.-Date:13th March, 2012
Heard both sides. By consent the figure mentioned in para 2 of theorder dated 15th February 2012 is corrected and it would read as Rs.1crore 10 lakhs instead of Rs.11 lakhs 10 thousand. Needless to clarifythat the computation in terms of para 4 of the order would be on thebasis of this corrected figure. The application for speaking to theminutes is disposed off. Time to comply with the order dated 15thFebruary 2012 is extended by three weeks.
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue