Versusasstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 7(1 v. Kalpataru Colours And Chemicals [Income Tax Appeal (L)
High Court
06 Aug 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Versusasstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 7(1 v. Kalpataru Colours And Chemicals [Income Tax Appeal (L)
Date of order
06 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Versusasstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 7(1 v. Kalpataru Colours And Chemicals [Income Tax Appeal (L), the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.The Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3722 OF 2009
M/s.Pohoomal Exports Private Limited
VersusAsstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 7(1)
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the appellant.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan with Ms.Padma Divakar for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 6 August 2010.
P.C. :
1.On the request of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee and the learned Counsel for the Revenue, the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 17 April 2008 is set aside and the proceedings are remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in the light of the judgment delivered on 29 June 2010 in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals [Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2887 of 2009].
In the circumstances, this appeal is disposed of, on the request of
Counsel for the Revenue and the assessee, by directing the Assessing Officer to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with law and, while passing fresh
orders to have due regard to the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (supra).
3.The Appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order
as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.