Case Law › High Court › Versusgoa Daman And Diu, Industrial Dev....

Versusgoa Daman And Diu, Industrial Dev. Corpn. Panaji v. Mohta &Nutan D. Sardessai, Jj.-Date:20Th March, 2017

High Court 20 Mar 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

20 Mar 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Versusgoa Daman And Diu, Industrial Dev. Corpn. Panaji v. Mohta &Nutan D. Sardessai, Jj.-Date:20Th March, 2017, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: The reference is disposed of accordingly by keeping allpoints open, including the question of law, if any.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA REFERENCE UNDER INCOME TAX ACT NO. 15 OF 2016 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA-I BANGALORE. VersusGOA DAMAN AND DIU, INDUSTRIAL DEV. CORPN. PANAJI. ... Applicant ... Respondent Mr. K. Arvind, Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the applicant. -Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA &NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.-Date:20th March, 2017 Final Order : Mr. K. Arvind, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, and specifically referring to CircularNo.21/2015 dated 10 December 2015 submits that the applicantis not pressing the reference. The learned Counsel also submitsthat based on the same circular, some other similarly situatedreferences have already been disposed of. 2. The reference is disposed of accordingly by keeping allpoints open, including the question of law, if any. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. ssm. ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.