Case Law › High Court › Versusm/S Emerald Cruises v. Madgavkar

Versusm/S Emerald Cruises v. Madgavkar

High Court 30 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

30 Apr 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Versusm/S Emerald Cruises v. Madgavkar, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 283 OF 2007 THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND 2 ORS. VersusM/S EMERALD CRUISES REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR ANAND V. MADGAVKAR ... Applicant ... Respondent Ms. Amina Shaikh, Advocate for the Applicant.Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the Respondent. -Coram:S.A.BOBDE &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:30th April, 2007 P.C.:- This Miscellaneous Civil Application for deletion of RespondentNo.1 is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. S.A.BOBDE, J. RD. N. A. BRITTO, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.