Versussmt. Sumanbai Waman Choudhariand Another v. Gangapurwala Andk. K. Sonawane, Jj. Date : 05Th May, 2016
High Court
05 May 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Versussmt. Sumanbai Waman Choudhariand Another v. Gangapurwala Andk. K. Sonawane, Jj. Date : 05Th May, 2016
Date of order
05 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Versussmt. Sumanbai Waman Choudhariand Another v. Gangapurwala Andk. K. Sonawane, Jj. Date : 05Th May, 2016, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 ca 5887.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5887 OF 2016
IN
TAX APPEAL NO. 04 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Nashik
.. Applicant
VersusSmt. Sumanbai Waman Choudhariand another.. Respondents
Shri Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for the Applicant.Shri S. N. Rodge, Advocate h/f Shri N. L. Chaudhary, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA ANDK. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 05TH MAY, 2016.
PER COURT :
.Issue notice to respondents. The learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1.
2.Heard the learned counsel for respective parties. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”. Tax Appeal No. 04 of 2002 is restored to its original position. The civil application is disposed of.
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]bsb/May 16
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.