Versusthe Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Margao Goa v. U. V. Bakre, Jj
High Court
19 Jul 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Versusthe Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Margao Goa v. U. V. Bakre, Jj
Date of order
19 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Versusthe Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Margao Goa v. U. V. Bakre, Jj, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 46 OF 2006
M/S GOA SHIPYARD LTD.,VASCO DA GAMA,GOA.
VersusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MARGAO GOA.
... Appellant
... Respondent
Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. V. Lotlikar, Advocate for the respondent.
P.C.:-
-Coram:A. P. LAVANDE &
U. V. BAKRE, JJ.
-Date:19th July, 2012
Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for theappellant submits that he has been instructed by the appellant towithdraw the appeal.
2. In view of the statement made by Mr. Usgaonkar, theappeal is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
ssm.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue