Case LawHigh Court › Vicki Roopchand Shadi v. Income Tax Offi...

Vicki Roopchand Shadi v. Income Tax Officer, Amravati And Others

High Court 14 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Vicki Roopchand Shadi v. Income Tax Officer, Amravati And Others
Date of order
14 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Vicki Roopchand Shadi v. Income Tax Officer, Amravati And Others, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 367 OF 2025 ( Vicki Roopchand Shadi vs. Income Tax Officer, Amravati and others ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, and the Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's orders of direction, Court's or Judge's order Mr. R.D.Heda, Advocate for the petitioner.Mr. B.N.Mohta, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2025 WRIT PETITION NO.367/2025 1)Issue notice for final disposal, returnable on 12/03/2025, as Hexaware Technologies Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and others (Writ Petition No.1778/2023, decided on 03/05/2024 is stated to have been fixed before the Hon’ble Apex Court. 2)In view of the above, the respondents shall not proceed against the petitioner by way of an interim arrangement. In view of the above, the respondents shall not 3)Mr.Mohta, learned counsel, waives service of notice for respondents. 4)To be listed along with Writ Petition No.5555/2024. CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.323/2025 1)This is an application seeking amendment to the petition. It is contended that the date of notice has been incorrectly mentioned due to a typographical mistake, and therefore, the petitioner wants to correct the same, to which learned counsel for respondents has no objection. 2)Having considered the reasons stated in the application and no objection from the learned counsel for respondents, the application is allowed as prayed. 3)The amendment be carried out within two weeks, and an amended copy of the petition shall be supplied to the other side within one week thereafter. ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) KOLHE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan