Vide Orders Of Even Date, Passed In Ita v. Oh. Narinder Kumar Sekhri, This Appeal Is Allowed. For Reasons
High Court
29 Jan 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Vide Orders Of Even Date, Passed In Ita v. Oh. Narinder Kumar Sekhri, This Appeal Is Allowed. For Reasons
Date of order
29 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Vide Orders Of Even Date, Passed In Ita v. Oh. Narinder Kumar Sekhri, This Appeal Is Allowed. For Reasons, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Narinder Kumar Sekhri, this appeal is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA No. 99 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 158 of 2006Date of Decision: 29.01.2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-Jalandhar-II, Jalandhar.
VS,
... Appellant
Sh. Chaman Lal Sekhri
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY,
Present: Mr. Vivek Sethi Advocatefor the appellant. |
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate forMr. S.K. Mukni, Advocate for the respondent. |
+++
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J.
Vide orders of even date, passed in ITA No. 99 of2006, titled The Commissioner of Income Tax Jalandhar-ll Vs.oh. Narinder Kumar Sekhri, this appeal is allowed. For reasons,
see the orders passed in the aforesaid appeal.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE29.01.2014Jiten
(ANITA CHAUDHRY)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue