Vijay Channabasav Suttatti v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle And Anr
High Court
26 Mar 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Vijay Channabasav Suttatti v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle And Anr
Date of order
26 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Vijay Channabasav Suttatti v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle And Anr, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned bySHAMBHAVISHAMBHAVINILESHNILESHSHIVGANSHIVGANDate:2024.03.2719:58:53+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4054 OF 2024
Vijay Channabasav SuttattiVersusAssistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle And Anr.
…Petitioner…Respondents
Mr. Devendra Jain, i/by Ms. Radha Halbe, for Petitioner.Mr. Vikas T. Khanchandani, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATED:26[th] March, 2024
PC:-
1.Petitioner is impugning an order dated 22[nd] August 2023passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) rejectingPetitioner’s application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (“the Act”).
2.We have considered the impugned order as well as theapplication filed and we find no error in the order passed by the ITAT.We agree with the ITAT that application itself is in effect seeking areview of the ITAT’s order passed on 9[th] September 2022.
3.Therefore, Petition dismissed.
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue