Vijay Kumar Mallik v. Ass.commi. Of Income Tax
High Court
03 Apr 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Vijay Kumar Mallik v. Ass.commi. Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
1995-96
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Vijay Kumar Mallik v. Ass.commi. Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: From the facts discussed by the learned Tribunal and the other authorities i.e. the Assessing Officer and CIT (A), and from their findings we find that no substantial question of law arises for determination in this appeal, it is therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.618 of 2008
======================================================
Vijay Kumar Mallik .... .... Appellant/s Versus Ass.Commi. Of Income Tax .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Dr. K.N.Singh, Sr. Adv. : Dr. Kamdeo Sharma, Adv. : Mr. Shivjee Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Sr.SC Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, J.SC
.... .... Appellant/s
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAINORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)
Heard the parties and perused the judgment under appeal dated 27.06.2007 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna in I.T.A. No. 236 and 237/Pat/2006.
6. 03-04-2012
This appeal relates to I.T.A. No. 236 and assessment year 1995-96. From the facts discussed by the learned Tribunal and the other authorities i.e. the Assessing Officer and CIT (A), and from their findings we find that no substantial question of law arises for determination in this appeal, it is therefore, dismissed.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
Fahad./-
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue