Vijay Laxmi Shiksha Samiti v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur
High Court
03 Jul 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Vijay Laxmi Shiksha Samiti v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur
Date of order
03 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Vijay Laxmi Shiksha Samiti v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty asprayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8202/2023
Vijay Laxmi Shiksha Samiti, Having Its Registered Address AtAchrol, Tehsil Amer, Jaipur - 302002 Through Its Secretary ShriNemi Chand Yadav
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur Having Its Address AtSidhnath Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar Scheme, Lal Kothi Scheme,Behind New Vidhansabhan, Janpath, Jaipur 302015
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr.Siddharth Ranka with Ms.Shweta PareekPareek
For Respondent(s): Mr.Sandeep Pathak with Ms.Jaya P. PathakPathak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
03/07/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime is not pressing the petition with liberty to raise all the issuesraised in the petition in the proceedings under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961.
The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty asprayed for.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Monika/Aarzoo/175
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue