Case Law › High Court › Vijay Mehta, Huf v. Commissioner Of Inco...

Vijay Mehta, Huf v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ix

High Court 02 Feb 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

02 Feb 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Vijay Mehta, Huf v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ix, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 12. + ITA 183/2003 VIJAY MEHTA, HUF Through: None. ..... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 02.02.2016 1. The report has been received stating that the Appellant has shifted. The Appellant has obviously not furnished the changed address. 2. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. S. MURALIDHAR, J FEBRUARY 02, 2016/dn VIBHU BAKHRU, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.