Vijay Sagar v. Income Tax Officer Circle 52(1) & Ors
High Court
30 May 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Vijay Sagar v. Income Tax Officer Circle 52(1) & Ors
Date of order
30 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Vijay Sagar v. Income Tax Officer Circle 52(1) & Ors, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~353
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Decision delivered on: 02.08.2023
+ W.P.(C) 7634/2023
VIJAY SAGAR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Mitika Choudhary, Adv.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE 52(1) & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Sanjeev Menon, Jr. Standing Counsel. Mr Ashish Batra, Sr. Panel Counsel for Respondent/U.O.I.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
CM No.39136/2023
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CM No. 39135/2023
2. This is an application filed seeking recall of order dated 30.05.2023. 3. A perusal of the order would show that the petitioner’s counsel, i.e., Ms Mitika Choudhary, had made a submission before the Court that she has instruction to withdraw the writ petition, as the assessment order has been passed.
4. Since liberty was sought to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as
per law, leeway in that behalf was granted.
5. It is not disputed by Ms Choudhary that since the order dated 30.05.2023 being passed, a statutory appeal has been preferred.
6. In our view, this application is completely without merit.
7. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
8. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.
RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE
AUGUST 2, 2023/RY
GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.