Vinay Kumar Mangla v. C.b.i
High Court
23 Mar 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Vinay Kumar Mangla v. C.b.i
Date of order
23 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Vinay Kumar Mangla v. C.b.i, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of thecase, this petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 3354 / 2017
Vinay Kumar Mangla S/o Rajendra Mangla, At Present Income Tax Officer, Jhalawar, R/o A-206, Ashirwad Niranchal, Shrinathpuram A, Kota. (At Present in Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
C.B.I.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashwini Kumar Sharma Special P.P. for C.B.I.
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Order
23/03/2017
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. RC JAI2016 A 0019 registered at Police Station SPE: C.B.I. ACB, JaipurDistrict Jaipur, for offence under Section 7 of Prevention ofCorruption Act, 1988.
Heard.
As per the prosecution story, petitioner was caught redhanded while accepting bribe in a trap organized by the CentralBureau of Investigation. Petitioner is in custody since 30.12.2016.Challan has already been presented in the Court and conclusion oftrial may take time.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of thecase, this petition is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to bail subjectto satisfaction of the Trial Court.
(SABINA), J.
Sudha/70
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue