Vinayak Petrochem, Jhotwara Jaipur Maize Product, Near Railwaycrossing, Jaipur v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Jaipur
High Court
21 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Vinayak Petrochem, Jhotwara Jaipur Maize Product, Near Railwaycrossing, Jaipur v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Jaipur
Date of order
21 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Vinayak Petrochem, Jhotwara Jaipur Maize Product, Near Railwaycrossing, Jaipur v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Jaipur, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
[2025:RJ-JP:7991-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6286/2022
Vinayak Petrochem, Jhotwara Jaipur Maize Product, Near RailwayCrossing, Jaipur- 302012 (Rajasthan) Through Its Proprietor Mr.Vikram Singh S/o. Sh. Yogendra Singh
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(1), Jaipur
2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Ncrb Building,Statue Circle, JaipurStatue Circle, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : NoneFor Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singhi with For Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singhi with
Mr. Aditya Khandelwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAROrder
21/02/2025
1.Learned counsel for the respondent submits that theassessment order was passed during pendency of the petition andthe petitioner has availed remedy of appeal.
2.None has put in appearance on behalf of learned counsel forthe petitioner in spite of two pass overs.
3.In view of the statement made, this petition is disposed ofwith the liberty to the petitionerto pursue the remedy of appealand to raise all the issues raised before the Appellate Authority.
4.The petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application forrecalling of the order, in case there is a factual discrepancy in thestatement made by learned counsel for the respondents.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.