Vinod Chandran, J v. K.vinod Chandranjudge
High Court
25 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Vinod Chandran, J v. K.vinod Chandranjudge
Date of order
25 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Vinod Chandran, J v. K.vinod Chandranjudge, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 5TH MAGHA, 1939
ITA.No. 131 of 2012---------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 510/COCH/2010 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 31-01-2012
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT-----------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) KOCHI.
BY ADVS.SRI. P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT:
-----------------------
M/S. BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND, ANGAMALY, PIN-683 572.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR R1 BY ADV. SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEJITH
R1 BY ADV. SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-01-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA.No. 131 of 2012-------------------
APPENDIX----------
APPELLANT(S)' ANNEXURES:-----------------------ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE ORDER U/S.143(3) OF THE ASSESSING OFFICERDATED 29-12-2008.
ANNEXURE B:COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) DATED 15-06-2010.
ANNEXURE C:COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 31-01-2012.ANNEXURE D:COPY OF THE JUDGDMENT IN ITA. 1171/2009.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:
------------------------
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
dkr
K.VINOD CHANDRAN & ASHOK MENON, JJ.
-------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 131 of 2012
-------------------------------------------
Dated this the 25[th] day of January, 2018
J U D G M E N T
Vinod Chandran, J.
The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent submits thatsimilar matters in which the Tribunal had relied on the decision ofanother co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in M/s Matha Enterprises,Angamaly v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ernakulam (ITANo.302/2010 and connected cases) have been sent back to theTribunal for fresh consideration. The above appeal also deals withthe very same subject matter. In such circumstances, the appeal isrelegated back to the Tribunal along with I.T.A.No.115/2012 andconnected cases, relating to the very same assessee, who is therespondent herein. Hence, the above appeal is also disposed ofremanding the matter to the Tribunal and vacating the order of theTribunal impugned herein.Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRANJudge
Sd/-ASHOK MENONJudge
dkr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.