In Vinod Kumar Kantha v. The Principal Chief Commisioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1121-08-2024
Harsh/-
U
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17107 of 2022
======================================================
Vinod Kumar Kantha
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Principal Chief Commisioner of Income Tax
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, AdvocateFor the Respondent/s: Mr.Additional Solicitor General
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that thegrievance of the writ petitioner has been redressed and hence he
may be permitted to withdraw this application.
Permission is granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Partha Sarthy, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue