Vinodkumar Shantilal Shah v. The Commissioner Of Income- Tax Ward 19, Mumbai & Ors
High Court
08 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Vinodkumar Shantilal Shah v. The Commissioner Of Income- Tax Ward 19, Mumbai & Ors
Date of order
08 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Vinodkumar Shantilal Shah v. The Commissioner Of Income- Tax Ward 19, Mumbai & Ors, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Dusane
1/12 ITXA 925.2018.doc
BHALCHANDRAGOPAL DUSANE
Digitally signed byBHALCHANDRAGOPAL DUSANEDate: 2021.09.1311:22:01 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 925 OF 2018
Vinodkumar Shantilal Shah
....
Appellant
Vs.
The Commissioner of Income- Tax Ward 19, Mumbai & Ors.
….Respondents
Mr. P.C. Tripathi a/w Mr. Prakash Pandit for AppellantMr. Sham V. Walve for Respondents
Coram : K.R. SHRIRAM &
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ
Date : 8[th] SEPTEMBER, 2021
P.C.:
1.Mr. Tripathi seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal. The
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
2.Refund of Court fees, if any, be made in accordance with
rules.
( ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.