In Vinodkumar Shantilal Shah v. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 19 And Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within the period of four weeks from today, the Appeal itself stands dismissed without reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 61 OF 2018
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2565 OF 2017
Vinodkumar Shantilal Shah
Versus
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 19 and Anr.
… Appellant / Applicant
…Respondents
Mr. P.C. Tripathi, for the Applicant / Ori. Appellant.Mr. Sham Walve, for the Respondents.
PC:-
CORAM:M.S.SANKLECHA &RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.DATED:22ND FEBRUARY 2018
1.This Notice of Motion has been taken out to condone the delay of 7 days in filing the appeal from the order dated 6th April 2017 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.Perused the Affidavit in Support dated 24th November 2017
of the applicant and we are satisfied with the reasons stated therein for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal.
3.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
4.Needless to state that if the objections are not removed within the period of four weeks from today, the Appeal itself stands dismissed without reference to the Court.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. )
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue