Case Law › High Court › Vishal Khanna v. Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Vishal Khanna v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 & Anr

High Court 07 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

07 Sep 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Vishal Khanna v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 & Anr, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of along with the pending application.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7922/2016, C.M. APPL.32832/2016 VISHAL KHANNA ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Rajesh Mahna and Sh. Manu. K. Giri, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-11 & ANR. .... Respondents Through : Sh. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Standing Counsel, for revenue. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R% 07.09.2016 Issue notice. Sh. Rahul Kaushik, Advocate accepts notice. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that after adjusting the amounts allegedly due, the respondents have made a tax demand of `1,75,000. It is claimed that the assessee sought rectification of the amounts on 24.08.2016. The respondents shall expeditiously deal with the rectification application and indicate its orders within eight weeks from today. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of along with the pending application. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SEPTEMBER 07, 2016/ajk DEEPA SHARMA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.