Case LawHigh Court › Vivek Kumar Singhania v. Principal Commi...

Vivek Kumar Singhania v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi

High Court 02 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Vivek Kumar Singhania v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi
Date of order
02 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Vivek Kumar Singhania v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No.56 of 2020 …..Petitioner Vivek Kumar Singhania Versus 1.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi 2.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, –DCIT / ACIT Circle 3, Ranchi … Respondents ------------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Biren Poddar, Sr. Advocate Ms. Rakhi Sharma, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate Mr. Mahendra Kr. Choudhary, Advocate ------------ 4/02.03.2020 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to avail the appellate remedy against the assessment order. This writ application is accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appellate Authority. The time spent before this Court shall be accounted for while calculating the limitation, if any, before the Assessing Authority. (H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kumar (Deepak Roshan, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan