Vivek Mohan Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
22 Feb 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Vivek Mohan Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Vivek Mohan Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: CM-1730-CI{[-2021 in/anTTA-231-2015 ITA2312015 In view of the averments made in CM-1730-CII-2021, the main appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
108IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CM-1730-CI[-2021 in/and
LTA-231-2015
Date of Decision: 272.2.202
Vivek Mohan Mittal
.....Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax-
...... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present:Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocate forMr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate, for the appellant.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (QRAL)
CM1730Cll2021
This is an application for withdrawal of the appeal with libertyto approach the respondent under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,2020 with a further prayer that in case the offer is not accepted, they may bepermitted to move an application for restoration,
Notice in the application.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel, accepts noticeon behalf of Income Tax Department and state that he has no objection to
the aforesaid.
Application is allowed as prayed for.
The main appeal is taken on board today itself.
CM12337CI]2015
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 132days in refiling the appeal is condoned.
CM stands disposed of.
CM-1730-CI{[-2021 in/anTTA-231-2015
ITA2312015
In view of the averments made in CM-1730-CII-2021, the main
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Since, the main case is dismissed as withdrawn, pending!
application, if any, stands disposed of.|
(AJAY TEWARITJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.