Case LawHigh Court › Vph v. Smruty Organics Ltd

Vph v. Smruty Organics Ltd

High Court 05 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Vph v. Smruty Organics Ltd
Date of order
05 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Vph v. Smruty Organics Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 461 of 2006The Commissioner of Income Tax-IVAppellantPune.Vs.Smruti Organics Ltd.RespondentMr. P. S. Sahadevan, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Balkrishna V. Jhaveri, Advocate for therespondent.CORAM : F. I. REBELLO &R. S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : MARCH 5, 2008P.C..As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4 lakhs,the learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.Hence, appeal dismissed as withdrawn. The issue oflaw, if any, is kept open for consideration inappropriat case. Refund of court fees as per rules.[ R.S. MOHITE, J.][ F. I. REBELLO, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan