Case LawHigh Court › V.ramakrishnan v. The Deputy Commissione...

V.ramakrishnan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle Iii(4)Chennai

High Court 08 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
V.ramakrishnan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle Iii(4)Chennai
Date of order
08 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In V.ramakrishnan v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle Iii(4)Chennai, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.07.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN T.C.A.Nos.650, 405, 1085 & 1086 of 2009 V.Ramakrishnan..Appellant inall TCAs. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle III(4)Chennai. .. Respondents inall TCAs. Prayer : Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order dated 20.06.2008 passed in ITA No.2197/Mds/2005 and I.T.(SS).A No.162/Mds/2003 and common order dated 03.10.2008 passed in I.T.(SS).A.No.153/Mds/2003 respectively and ITA No.744/Mds/2005 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench. For Appellant :Mr.A.S.Sriraman For Respondent :Mrs.V.PushpaSenior Standing Counsel __________ Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Both counsel, in unison, submitted that all points which were submitted before the Tribunal have not been considered in the impugned orders and therefore, the Court may quash and set aside the impugned orders and remand the matters for de novo consideration. 2. Accordingly, the impugned orders are quashed and set aside and the matters are remanded to the Tribunal for de novo consideration. 3. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 4. Since the matters pertain to block of 1989-90 to 1999-2000, the Tribunal is requested to dispose all these appeals at the earliest and preferably by 31.12.2025. __________ Page 2 of 4 5. Appeals are disposed. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J.) 08.07.2025 Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/No kpl To 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai. Chennai Benches, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-V Chennai. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle III(4) Chennai. Chennai. __________ Page 3 of 4 __________Page 4 of 4 T.C.A.Nos.650, 405, 1085 & 1086 of 2009 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND SUNDER MOHAN,J.(kpl) T.C.A.Nos.650, 405, 1085 & 1086 of 2009 08.07.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan